[MPlayer-cvslog] r26411 - trunk/libmpdemux/demuxer.c

[Benjamin Zores]

Uoti Urpala a écrit :
> On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 14:23 +0200, Alban Bedel wrote:
>> Because you regularly commits stuff that you very well know is
>> controversial. You could do like everyone else, send a patch, wait a
>> bit, then commit. But you don't, and as I can hardly believe that your
>> understanding is so impaired, it can only be for the shake of trolling.
> 
> I did not expect these commits to cause such controversy. I think it
> should be obvious enough why I don't want to send a patch first for
> every change (it usually causes more overhead than the work needed for
> the actual change). And controversial or not I don't make commits for
> trolling purposes.

It's hard to say but it'd be better if you do your own fork of MPlayer,
development would go faster and you'd finally have the player the way 
you want it to be (obviously all other MPlayer devels are against you 
...). For the record, my opinion doesn't matter much but I'd not vote
for your account revocation if I was asked about, as I find this
whole situation childish (and just writing so, I guess mine will be 
asked, but it's not like if I cared much loosing such a high privilege :-)

The best for you (and probably other people) would be you start your own
player based on ffmpeg libs only, getting rid of all old MPlayer code.
What would you miss after all ?
The only parts that are getting updated from MPlayer are everything that
natively comes from ffmpeg and all the Makefile/configure stuff.

Btw, what is the new MPlayer _development_ related mailing list email 
address ? I'd like to subscribe to, as this one seems not to serve this 
purpose any longer for quite a looooong time now.

PS: yeah I know, it's always more oil on the fire
PS2: flames are the only active parts of MPlayer.

Ben