[MPlayer-cvslog] r18990 - trunk/libmpdemux/demux_lavf.c

[Diego Biurrun]

On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 10:27:24AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 07:16:00AM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 04:53 +0200, rfelker wrote:
> > > Log:
> > > more c++ decl crap
> > 
> > It's not C++, as you should well know. It's C, as opposed to legacy C
> 
> It's called C++ declarations for the same reason // comments are
> called C++ comments.
> 
> > with workarounds for broken compilers. Seems nobody else had tried
> > compiling with gcc 2.95 for 3 weeks. Time to drop support for it I
> > think.
> 
> No, absolutely not. If you continue with such trolling I will
> fight to have you removed from development. gcc3 generates SLOWER CODE
> than gcc 2.95 and gcc 4 DOES NOT COMPILE on machines with less than
> several gigs of virtual memory. Thus 2.95 is the only option.

gcc 3.4 does not generate slower code than 2.95, it just takes far
longer but the end result is slightly faster.  Look up the numbers I
generated ages ago.

Now stop this useless flamage.

Diego