[MPlayer-cvslog] CVS: main/debian control,1.14,1.15

[Aurelien Jacobs]

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:49:44 +0100
Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 07:16:52PM +0100, Aurelien Jacobs wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:57:03 +0100
> > Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:19:25PM +0100, Aurelien Jacobs CVS wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > --- control	7 Dec 2002 21:36:25 -0000	1.14
> > > > +++ control	10 Jan 2006 21:19:22 -0000	1.15
> > > > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> > > > -Build-Depends: libglib-dev, libgtk-dev, xlibs-dev, libpng-dev, zlib1g-dev, debhelper (>= 2)
> > > > +Build-Depends: libgtk1.2-dev | libgtk2.0-dev, libpng12-dev, zlib1g-dev, x-dev, libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxinerama-dev, libxv-dev, libxvmc-dev, libxxf86dga-dev, libxxf86vm-dev, debhelper (>= 2)
> > > 
> > > I'd say that list is a bit long, few of these are strictly necessary.
> > > libgtk/libpng only for gui,
> > 
> > As long as the rules file contains --enable-gui, those ones are mandatory.
> 
> Oops, yes, I forgot.  Probably we should remove --enable-gui from there,
> I don't think the Debian package should behave different from the
> official sources.

Hum... I'm not sure everyone would be happy to have this removed.
I personnaly don't care.
Maybe Dominik's solution to have 2 separate packages (one for gmplayer
and one for mplayer) would be better.
But remember that this debian/ directory is especially meant for
everyone to build his own debian package. So separating in 2 binary
packages won't change anything, as we would still have the build-depend
on libgtk*-dev.

> > > libxvmc only for xvmc,
> > 
> > Ok, this one is not very common, but I think it can be useful to keep it.
> 
> As a recommends or suggests maybe, but not as a build dependency.  I'd
> vote for removing it.

Hey, there is no notion of recommends or suggests at build time !
Either we build-depend on it or not, but there is no intermediate possibility.
I also don't care about this one, but won't remove it myself.

> > > libxxf86dga and libxxf86vm only for obsolete vo drivers IIUC...
> > 
> > Ok, we can probably remove those two. If no one disagree, I will
> > remove them.
> 
> Go ahead.

Done.

Aurel