[MPlayer-cvslog] r19341 - in trunk/stream: Makefile asf_mmst_streaming.c asf_streaming.c network.c network.h pnm.c stream_ftp.c stream_netstream.c stream_rtsp.c stream_vstream.c tcp.c tcp.h

[Michael Niedermayer]

Hi

On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 11:52:14PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 10:52:30PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 10:20:09PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > > and the whole cvs->svn policy chnages change it significnatly,
> > > 
> > > Ivo volunteered to rewrite the guide, I reviewed his changes, there were
> > > patches and discussion on -dev-eng and -cvslog.  IMO that is more than
> > > plenty occasion to speak up.
> > 
> > ok, that makes me guilty for being lazy, not reading the realated mails
> > carefully and consequently not complaining earlier
> 
> You lazy lout, you ;)

:)


> 
> > > > so IMO EVERY commit to the policy should be posted as patch to dev-eng
> > > > and should receive at least more "ok" then "not ok" replies, that also
> > > > implies at least one "ok" 
> > > 
> > > IMO editorial changes are OK, substantial changes should be discussed on
> > > dev-eng.
> > 
> > fully agree but the question if something is editorial must be disscussed
> > on dev-eng then, this thread proofs that people can disagree about if
> > something is editorial or not
> 
> Of course people can (and will) disagree.  Still I think one should try
> to use common sense when making such changes.  In most cases it's not
> very hard to tell what changes might be problematic, though.  If somebody
> disagrees flames usually arrive quickly anyway ;)

hmm, ok ok, i give up but i will force the next guy (or girl) who does such
a "editorial" change to the policy to drink 10l (burning) napalm


[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

In the past you could go to a library and read, borrow or copy any book
Today you'd get arrested for mere telling someone where the library is