[MPlayer-cvslog] CVS: main cfg-common.h, 1.161, 1.162 cfg-mencoder.h, 1.107, 1.108 cfg-mplayer.h, 1.263, 1.264 configure, 1.1179, 1.1180 edl.c, 1.7, 1.8 mencoder.c, 1.352, 1.353 mplayer.c, 1.947, 1.948
Uoti Urpala
uoti.urpala at pp1.inet.fi
Fri Apr 28 19:46:29 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [MPlayer-cvslog] CVS: main cfg-common.h, 1.161, 1.162 cfg-mencoder.h, 1.107, 1.108 cfg-mplayer.h, 1.263, 1.264 configure, 1.1179, 1.1180 edl.c, 1.7, 1.8 mencoder.c, 1.352, 1.353 mplayer.c, 1.947, 1.948
- Next message: [MPlayer-cvslog] CVS: main cfg-common.h, 1.161, 1.162 cfg-mencoder.h, 1.107, 1.108 cfg-mplayer.h, 1.263, 1.264 configure, 1.1179, 1.1180 edl.c, 1.7, 1.8 mencoder.c, 1.352, 1.353 mplayer.c, 1.947, 1.948
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 12:57 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> > I did discuss the change with a couple of developers on irc before
> > committing, and there was no reason to think it would be controversial.
>
> IRC is nice for talking with other developers and learning but from
> the policy standpoint discussion on IRC does not count as discussing
> the patch, since most of the developers are not included. In the
That's why I did separately mention there was no reason to think it
would be controversial. I would have also posted to the mailing list if
it had been a change some might disagree with.
- Previous message: [MPlayer-cvslog] CVS: main cfg-common.h, 1.161, 1.162 cfg-mencoder.h, 1.107, 1.108 cfg-mplayer.h, 1.263, 1.264 configure, 1.1179, 1.1180 edl.c, 1.7, 1.8 mencoder.c, 1.352, 1.353 mplayer.c, 1.947, 1.948
- Next message: [MPlayer-cvslog] CVS: main cfg-common.h, 1.161, 1.162 cfg-mencoder.h, 1.107, 1.108 cfg-mplayer.h, 1.263, 1.264 configure, 1.1179, 1.1180 edl.c, 1.7, 1.8 mencoder.c, 1.352, 1.353 mplayer.c, 1.947, 1.948
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the MPlayer-cvslog
mailing list