[Mplayer-cvslog] CVS: homepage/src news.src.en,1.30,1.31

Gabucino gabucino at mplayerhq.hu
Sat Aug 9 01:50:23 CEST 2003


Update of /cvsroot/mplayer/homepage/src
In directory mail:/var/tmp.root/cvs-serv8733/src

Modified Files:
	news.src.en 
Log Message:
g1 news
motto: dugni vagy nemdugni, ez kurvara nem kerdes


Index: news.src.en
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/mplayer/homepage/src/news.src.en,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -r1.30 -r1.31
--- news.src.en	6 Aug 2003 14:58:58 -0000	1.30
+++ news.src.en	8 Aug 2003 23:50:20 -0000	1.31
@@ -2,6 +2,68 @@
 <font class="bigheader">
 	<br>
 	<a name="debianandsusesux">
+	2003.08.09, Saturday :: MPlayer G1 news
+	</a>
+	<br>
+</font>
+<font class="header">
+	posted by Gabucino</a><br>
+</font>
+<font class="text">
+	<br>
+	Everyone is obsessed about MPlayer G2. But what about our good old
+	companion, <b>MPlayer G1</b>? Well, not much. Honestly. If you have
+	ever listened to what we were saying you know that there are currently
+	two G1 branches:
+	<ol>
+		<li><b>0_90</b> - which is the 0.90 version, plus critical bug
+		  fixes. This is probably our most stable version at the
+		  present, however it is also the most featureless. It doesn't
+		  even include Sorenson 3. A new release from this particular
+		  branch has already been scheduled since months, but it was
+		  always delayed in the end. My opinion is: it doesn't even
+		  worth a release.<br>
+		  <br>
+		  Currently the maintainers and release coordinators for this
+		  branch are me, and Diego Biurrun (yo diego!;). Expect <i>MPlayer
+		  0.91</i> to born from here.</li>
+		<li><b>main</b> - the ordinary head development branch. Most
+		  features. Most unstable. Least A'rpi :) Definitely a must-use
+		  branch. Don't use that shit 0_90. Ever. So. What I really
+		  mean is that we don't have even the slightest idea about this
+		  branch. No release timeframe (everyone just says ASAP, then
+		  goes on holiday, and/or fucking teen girls), not even a
+		  common agreement on version numbering.<br>
+		  <br>
+		  I think it is also us two who are coordinating the release of
+		  this shit. Maybe it will be <i>0.99</i>. Keep reading this
+		  lame news in the following days to get informed.</li>
+	</ol>
+	<br>
+	<i>So WTF should I do?</i> - says the casual user. Heed my words:
+	go to a cinema with a girl.<br>
+	<br>
+	(Devel team's note: we're looking for babes who are into
+	<!-- unconditional sex --> "MPlayer development". Really. Mail us.)<br>
+	<br>
+</font>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<font class="bigheader">
+	<br>
+	<a name="debianandsusesux">
 	2003.08.06, Wednesday :: Debian follows SuSE? Please do NOT package crippled MPlayer!
 	</a>
 	<br>



More information about the MPlayer-cvslog mailing list