[MEncoder-users] x264 encoding slower after updating libx264

belcampo belcampo at zonnet.nl
Sun Nov 15 12:31:56 CET 2009


Loren Merritt wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Dâniel Fraga wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Loren Merritt wrote:
>>
>>> MB-tree is enabled by default now, didn't exist in api67, and takes a
>>> bunch of memory.
>>> B-frames and multiref are enabled by default now, weren't in api67, and
>>> take some memory and cpu-time.
>>> RDO, trellis, and several other options are enabled by default
>>> now, weren't in api67, and take cpu-time.
>>> All of the above also affect filesize.
>>
>>     And all of these options result in better quality? Because I
>> didn't notice any improvement in the quality... of course I'm just
>> looking at the video (I didn't do any scientific comparison).
> 
> All of these options result in better compression ratio. That can be 
> either better quality or lower bitrate, depending on what ratecontrol 
> mode you choose.
So if I understand correct, given a constant quality, it would result in 
a smaller file ?
> 
> --Loren Merritt
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEncoder-users mailing list
> MEncoder-users at mplayerhq.hu
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mencoder-users



More information about the MEncoder-users mailing list