[MEncoder-users] x264 encoding slower after updating libx264
belcampo
belcampo at zonnet.nl
Sun Nov 15 12:31:56 CET 2009
Loren Merritt wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Dâniel Fraga wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Loren Merritt wrote:
>>
>>> MB-tree is enabled by default now, didn't exist in api67, and takes a
>>> bunch of memory.
>>> B-frames and multiref are enabled by default now, weren't in api67, and
>>> take some memory and cpu-time.
>>> RDO, trellis, and several other options are enabled by default
>>> now, weren't in api67, and take cpu-time.
>>> All of the above also affect filesize.
>>
>> And all of these options result in better quality? Because I
>> didn't notice any improvement in the quality... of course I'm just
>> looking at the video (I didn't do any scientific comparison).
>
> All of these options result in better compression ratio. That can be
> either better quality or lower bitrate, depending on what ratecontrol
> mode you choose.
So if I understand correct, given a constant quality, it would result in
a smaller file ?
>
> --Loren Merritt
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEncoder-users mailing list
> MEncoder-users at mplayerhq.hu
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mencoder-users
More information about the MEncoder-users
mailing list