[MEncoder-users] divx v's x264

[Alex Samad]

On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:22:45PM +0000, J. M. wrote:
> Alex Samad <alex <at> samad.com.au> writes:
> 
> > My presumption when making that statement was that I was using
> > different codecs.  If I use different codecs then I would presume I
> > would get different size's. 
> 
> Bitrate, by definition, means number of bits per unit of time (usually a 
> second). So for example, 400 kb/s bitrate means 400 kilobits per second, which 
> means a 60 second video takes 400*60 kilobits, i.e. 24,000 kilobits.
> 
> So bitrate is bitrate (and therefore filesize), regardless of the codec.

yep silly me, I thought it was something like compression ir zip v's
rar, better algo better compression. Thus for the same source you would
get a smaller file.

like I said silly me

> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEncoder-users mailing list
> MEncoder-users at mplayerhq.hu
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mencoder-users
> 

-- 
The secret of staying young is to live honestly, eat slowly, and lie about 
your age.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mencoder-users/attachments/20080605/ffa9e973/attachment.pgp>