[MEncoder-users] Fwd: Questions on Mencoder performace
larrystotler at netscape.net
larrystotler at netscape.net
Tue Jun 6 01:19:53 CEST 2006
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Phil Ehrens <phil at slug.org>
>None of these things will give you as big a performance boost as
>switching from xvid to lavc will. Using '-oac copy' will also give
>you a performance (and quality) boost. Good starting options for
>lavc:
>-lavcopts vcodec=mpeg4:nr=1000:mbd=2:v4mv:trell:vpass=N:vbitrate=1800
>You will want to look into the docs for using cropdetect as well.
How well does lavc work on slower machines? When you get right down to
it, it has to play on a slower machine, so if faster re-encoiding
results in a file that won't work as well on a slower machine, then
I'll stick with slower encoding. I also usually look for wide screen
since I use them with a projector as well.
As for '-oac copy' that just copies the MP2 audio. That would make the
file size larger than using MP3,correct? Will that work better on a
slower system?
A friend has a P4 Xeon 2.8Ghz, and he gets around 50 first pass and
25-30 second pass. That's why I am wondering. We haven't been able to
check since his system is a Xeon and mine isn't....
___________________________________________________
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import Your Contact List
http://mail.netscape.com
More information about the MEncoder-users
mailing list