On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:12:09 -0800 Phil Ehrens <phil at slug.org> wrote: > You were doing a binary search? Wow, that's efficient, or so I hear. Uses up some CPU cycles, but not much bandwidth, and it's doesn't take-up much of my time. So it's plenty effecient, in every way that matters. Better than trying to manually reverse each change from CVS-log, IMHO.