[MEncoder-users] new doom9 codec comparission (submission)

[Guillaume POIRIER]

On 12/15/05, Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal.cx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:04:52PM +0100, Matthias Wieser wrote:
[..]
> > If the decoder would be the single cause for this then it should be no
> > problem to capture some snapshots which show the difference between
> > ffdshow and atme's decoder. We don't need to guess if atme is good or
> > bad. We can measure it.
>
> I never even heard of atme before this test, wtf is it?

http://www.ateme.com/home.php

It's "just" the (French) company that won last year's codec comparison.

[..]

> > At least the last comparison showed quite big
> > differences - for example some video codecs did not show any raindrops
> > while other codecs preserved those fine details. It's highly unrealistic
> > that small, accumulated dct errors make raindrops disappear.
>
> We're only talking about two codecs here, lavc and xvid. I haven't
> seen doom9's screenshots. Would you care to point me at them.

2003 codec comparison
http://www.doom9.org/index.html?/codecs-203-1.htm

2004 codec comparison
http://www.doom9.org/index.html?/codecs-104-1.htm

Guillaume

--
MPlayer's doc is offline. Find some fresh one here:
http://tuxrip.free.fr//MPlayer-DOCS-HTML/en/
http://tuxrip.free.fr//MPlayer-DOCS-HTML/fr/