[Libav-user] libswresample vs libavfilter for target format conversion

[Jorge Israel Peña]

>
> I believe the main benefit is that if you want to (also)
> use another filter, you only need to open one filtergraph.
> If you are not using another audio filter, there probably
> is no benefit (except that you may or may not prefer the
> filter interface over the libswresample interface).


Ah, okay. Thanks, I appreciate the clarification.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos at ag.or.at> wrote:

> Jorge Israel Peña <jorgepblank at ...> writes:
>
> > Aside from that, what are the benefits of using libavfilter
> > for converting to the target format over using libswresample?
>
> I believe the main benefit is that if you want to (also)
> use another filter, you only need to open one filtergraph.
> If you are not using another audio filter, there probably
> is no benefit (except that you may or may not prefer the
> filter interface over the libswresample interface).
>
> Carl Eugen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libav-user mailing list
> Libav-user at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
>



-- 
- Jorge Israel Peña
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/libav-user/attachments/20130319/0ee32469/attachment.html>