[Libav-user] Runtime ARM Neon detection?

[Reuben Scratton]

>>>> License: nonfree and unredistributable

> (If you believe something is unclear about
> above message and that it does not explain
> that you may not legally distribute the
> resulting binary, please tell us!)

I imagine I missed it because it gets buried in the metric ton of
compilation output (warnings etc) that results from building FFmpeg with
GCC.


> Then please remove the option --enable-nonfree
> from your configure line.

Already done.


> It is a copyright violation to distribute
> FFmpeg binaries that were built with this
> option.

Fortunately for me this version of the app isn't yet published. The current
market version relies on very buggy platform support to play video, which
is a different world of hurt but at least it's legally clear.

Thanks for the legal advice, I guess.



On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos at ag.or.at> wrote:

> Reuben Scratton <reuben.scratton at ...> writes:
>
> >>> License: nonfree and unredistributable
>
> (If you believe something is unclear about
> above message and that it does not explain
> that you may not legally distribute the
> resulting binary, please tell us!)
>
> >> But this is certainly not the configure line you
> >> use for the version that your Android users
> >> tested and protested performance-wise or am I
> >> wrong?
> >
> > You're not wrong, this is indeed the version
> > being protested performance-wise.
>
> Then please remove the option --enable-nonfree
> from your configure line.
> It is a copyright violation to distribute
> FFmpeg binaries that were built with this
> option.
>
> Carl Eugen
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libav-user mailing list
> Libav-user at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/libav-user/attachments/20130411/dffe0c4c/attachment.html>