[Libav-user] Compiling without --enable-nonfree still produces non-free library?
Kip Warner
kip at thevertigo.com
Sun Apr 17 00:37:50 CEST 2011
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 00:34 +0200, Soltic Lucas wrote:
> Well.. according to Hendrik's explanation, I would use something even
> more explicit like --enable-non-redistributable.
How about --enable-non-binary-only-redist?
--
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
http://www.thevertigo.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/libav-user/attachments/20110416/7002011b/attachment.asc>
More information about the Libav-user
mailing list