[Libav-user] Compiling without --enable-nonfree still produces non-free library?

[Kip Warner]

On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 00:20 +0200, Soltic Lucas wrote:
> Oh ok, thanks you very much! Maybe the "--enable-nonfree" option
> should be a bit clearer on this point. When I read it I thought I
> could freely use every format supported by my "free" build without any
> patent concern.

I agree. Maybe it should be renamed to --enable-binary-only?

-- 
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
http://www.thevertigo.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/libav-user/attachments/20110416/5298db7c/attachment.asc>