[FFmpeg-user] More Liberal Licensing

[David Bernat]

Licensing is not the issue. Show of force required.

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:41 AM Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>
wrote:

>
>
> Am 28.11.23 um 11:35 schrieb David Bernat:
> > Please unsubscribe. I have sent numerous requests.
>
> what is your problem?
>
> nobody needs another 10 mails within minutes in the style of "This is
> not meant to be used as a library. This is an application"
>
> it's not possible to change the license, it won't happen and both where
> statet clearly - so no reason to ride the dead horse in another 10 mails
>
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:34 AM Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Am 28.11.23 um 11:32 schrieb Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena:
> >>> This is the reason OpenJDK is successful though at this point of time
> >> they
> >>> are very well at a point they can change the license.
> >>>
> >>> GPL nature of the license prevented fragmentation by de-incentivising
> >>> competing incompatible hard forks.
> >>
> >> leave us in peace - a license change won't happen even if it would be
> >> possible but it isn't
> >>
> >> case closed
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-user-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>