[FFmpeg-user] Two questions about LGPL
Carl Zwanzig
cpz at tuunq.com
Wed Apr 6 19:22:02 EEST 2022
There are _many_ answers to the linking question out there, a simple search
will turn them up-
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1394623/can-i-dynamically-call-a-lgpl-gpl-software-in-my-closed-source-application
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10130143/gpl-lgpl-and-static-linking
https://fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-lgpl-license/
or even
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html
and
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#LGPLStaticVsDynamic
On 4/6/2022 4:23 AM, 宋麒 wrote:
> Q2: If my commercial product is a "work that uses FFmpeg", do I need to
> remove all prohibition of reverse engineering from the EULA of my product?
I'd do that anyway; it's pretty much unenforceable, at least in the USA and
probably Europe, and tells people that they won't have to look very hard to
see how things work.
The first stop for ffmpeg license questions is
https://ffmpeg.org/legal.html, and for (L)GPL questions is the FAQs linked
above.
z!
More information about the ffmpeg-user
mailing list