[FFmpeg-user] How are ffmpeg internal frames structured?
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
markfilipak at bog.us
Sun Feb 7 04:42:30 EET 2021
On 02/06/2021 09:37 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> Am So., 7. Feb. 2021 um 03:27 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
> <markfilipak at bog.us>:
>
>> "not deinterlaced" == not this:
>>
>> pixel[0,0] pixel[0,1] ... pixel[0,in_w-1] pixel[2,0] pixel[2,1] ... pixel[in_h-2,in_w-1] ...
>> pixel[1,0] pixel[1,1] ... pixel[1,in_w-1] pixel[3,0] pixel[3,1] ... pixel[in_h-1,in_w-1]
>
> In the terminology of the FFmpeg project (which is the only one
> relevant on this mailing list), above is not called "deinterlaced".
That's fine. I understand. If it's not called "deinterlaced", then what do I call it?
>> and, I should add, not in macroblocks in slices.
>
> I still believe that macroblocks cannot have a meaning for raw video,
> same with slices.
I agree. I'm simply being comprehensive.
--
I don't have a dog.
And furthermore, my dog doesn't bite.
And furthermore, you provoked him.
More information about the ffmpeg-user
mailing list