[FFmpeg-user] asubboost and asupercut

[Phil Rhodes]

    On Sunday, 29 November 2020, 15:55:29 GMT, Michael Koch <astroelectronic at t-online.de> wrote:  
> The name "feedback" is misleading because this signal isn't going back.> It would make sense to rename "feedback" to "wet".> What's now "wet" could be renamed "gain", or it could be removed because > it's unnecessary.
I may not be fully comprehending the behaviour of the software in this case, but if your diagram is accurate that would make sense. Certainly it would reflect the meaning of the terms "dry" and "wet" as they're commonly used in audio processing. Using those terms in another way is confusing.
P