[FFmpeg-user] ffprobe bug in 'interlaced_frame'?

[Carl Eugen Hoyos]

Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 21:50 Uhr schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos
<ceffmpeg at gmail.com>:
>
> Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 21:19 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
> <markfilipak.windows+ffmpeg at gmail.com>:
>
> > On 01/26/2020 03:03 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > > Am So., 26. Jan. 2020 um 20:51 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak
> > > <markfilipak.windows+ffmpeg at gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >> For soft telecined videos, all frames have
> > >> 'progressive_frame' = 1
> > >
> > > I may miss something but since FFmpeg does not "support" soft-telecine
> > > why should there be an interlaced frame?
> >
> > Yes, ffmpeg does not make soft telecined streams. However, the soft
> > telecined videos are inputs, not outputs.
>
> I don't think FFmpeg "supports" soft-telecined input streams.
> At least not in the way once opon a time defined in an ancient NTSC
> standard...

PS:
We would of course see this had you provided the (necessary)
console output.

Carl Eugen