[FFmpeg-user] Handy field & frame notation -- oops

Mark Filipak markfilipak.windows+ffmpeg at gmail.com
Thu Oct 24 02:08:23 EEST 2019


Oops: "10 fields" was "8 fields".

ffmpeg related (I hope)...

The Problem.

Traditional notation (example: 2-3 pull-down telecine) denotes sets of 4 
film frames & 10 fields thus:

...frames...     ....fields.....
[1][2][3][4] --> [1][2][2][3][4]
                  [1][2][3][4][4]

Better, including time sequence, would be:

[1][2][3][4] --> [1]   [2]   [2]   [3]   [4]
                     [1]   [2]   [3]   [4]   [4]

But, for obvious reasons, this doesn't work:

[1][2][3][4] --> [1][1][2][2][2][3][3][4][4][4]


The Solution.

The new notation denotes sets of 4 film frames & 10 fields thus:

[A/a][B/b][C/c][D/d] --> [A][a][B][b][B][c][C][d][D][d]

It shows both the mechanics of 2-3 telecine and TFF='1' on a single line.


Details of field notation.

This: [A], and this: [a], are fields.
This: [A] (capitalized), is an odd (aka "top") field.
This: [a] (lower case), is an even (aka "bottom") field.

Examples of field notation:

720x480i24 can be unambiguously characterized by
[A][a][B][b][C][c][D][d] (which is 1/6th second of video).

720x576i25-telecine can be unambiguously characterized by
[A][a][B][b][C][c][D][d][E][e] (which is 1/5th second of video).

720x576i25-telecast can be unambiguously characterized by
[A][b][C][d][E][f][G][h][I][j] (which is 1/5th second of video).

720x480i30-2323telecine can be unambiguously characterized by
[A][a][B][b][B][c][C][d][D][d] (which is 1/6th second of video).

720x480i30-2332telecine can be unambiguously characterized by
[A][a][B][b][B][c][C][c][D][d] (which is 1/6th second of video).

720x480i30-telecast can be unambiguously characterized by
[A][b][C][d][E][f][G][h][I][j][K][l] (which is 1/5th second of video).

Rule: Field characterizations retain their picture identities relative 
to their origins, not relative to the sources (or targets) of any 
transcodes. Thus, because 1/6th second of a movie is sampled from film 
pictures 'A' 'B' 'C' & 'D' (or their equivalent digital camera 
captures), a conversion to 720x480i24 retains the origin's 'A' 'B' 'C' & 
'D' picture identities and therefore becomes [A][a][B][b][C][c][D][d]. 
Similarly, a subsequent conversion to 720x480i30-2323telecine carries 
the origin's picture identities to the next step as 
[A][a][B][b][B][c][C][d][D][d]. In that way, a video's format can be 
unambiguously characterized and traced back to its origin no matter what 
(or how many) transcodes are done.


Details of frame notation.

This: [A/a], is a frame conveying both the odd & even picture lines.

Example of frame notation:

720x480p24 can be unambiguously characterized by
[A/a][B/b][C/c][D/d] (which is 1/6th second of video).

The Rule for field characterizations also applies to frame 
characterizations. Thus, if 720x480p24 is converted to 720x480i24, the 
resulting fields are characterized by
[A][a][B][b][C][c][D][d].

Comments are welcome & encouraged.



More information about the ffmpeg-user mailing list