[FFmpeg-user] Building FFmpeg with OpenJPEG 2.0

[Reindl Harald]

Am 23.03.2016 um 22:06 schrieb NoMercy:
> Look now I'm replying over gmail and automatically does top-post by default
> (just like many other mail clients)

my tunderbird does too - fine for business mails, but i am capable to 
distinct between different mil type

> This is not an evil thing? it is just how it is. you may not like it, but
> you also do not have right to impose your own rules to others?

but i have the right as any other to just ignore questions where the 
scond response clutters the thread and if you seek for help you shoudl 
accept the rules of people which are able to help you - that's it

> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>
> wrote:
>
>> first the top-post version of my response, have fun by find out to *what*
>> exactly i refer with every paragraph - maybe *now* you understand the
>> difference
>>
>> that may be funny and not so difficult for this reply to your post only
>>
>> in a longer thread where quotes from several people make a context with
>> the idiotic top posting you need to write a lot of text to explain what
>> about you are talking instead just strip out irrelevant stuff, quote one,
>> two or more levels which makes sense and place your specific line directly
>> below the context
>>
>
> You can still clean up the rest of the post, there is no rule that you can
> not clean up if you top post?. you can comment inline too...
>
>
>> ____________________________________
>>
>> THAT IS FUNNY?
>> LET'S START WITH DEFINE "HERE" COMPARED TO BELOW
>> HAVE FUN IN A LONGER THREAD OVER DAYS
>>
>
> What I don't get is why people get *SOOO obsessed* about this? who makes
> the rules that says this is rude? there is no logical explanation... (about
> the rudeness of this not usability, we can argue about usability but in the
> end its up to one's personal preference, which *should not be threated like
> a sin*)
>
>
>>
>> see here why it makes sense to stip and quote selective
>>
>> no only any mailing list where people know how to use a mail client it's
>> discouraged
>>
>
> is there a rulebook to use mail client that I missed? and by your
> definition all the apple mail, gmail, outlook and many others (rest of the
> world really) does use it wrong and your rules are correct?? I appreciate
> your self confidence.
>
>
>>
>> it's not nonsense
>>
>> no idea what makes it impossible for you to place your cusor, strip
>> unneded quotes and place your answers below the quoted part
>>
>
> You can still do, comment under something, BUT WHAT IS WRONG WITH ALSO
> POSTING SOMETHING ABOVE ALL??? THIS IS NO SIN, GET OVER IT, PLEASE! NOR
> DISRESPECT. JUST A SIMPLE MAIL.
>
>
>>
>> or maybe it's time that you *learn to handle* your mail client
>>
>
> thank you I know my mail client well enough, I just dont prefer to use it
> YOUR way! and I think instead of imposing YOUR RULES to other people, you
> should learn to respect others choices of mail usage!
>
> Regards,
> Emre Besirik
>
> PS: in my book, as long as you put your regards at the end of your mail, it
> is respectful enough...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-user/attachments/20160324/44928f10/attachment.sig>