[FFmpeg-user] documentation in spanish
juan carlos Rebate
nerus492 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 6 18:05:37 CET 2016
2016-03-06 17:43 GMT+01:00 Paul B Mahol <onemda at gmail.com>:
> On 3/6/16, juan carlos Rebate <nerus492 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2016-03-06 8:58 GMT+01:00 Paul B Mahol <onemda at gmail.com>:
>>> On 3/6/16, juan carlos Rebate <nerus492 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 2016-03-05 22:14 GMT+01:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 05.03.2016 um 22:06 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-all.html
>>>>>>> seems to be up-to-date by listing > recent options and not legacy
>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>> like -b:v and so on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure if I'm missing something here, but that document absolutely
>>>>>> does
>>>>>> use -b:v in its examples, in the synopsis at least.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> exactly what i said - "seems to be up-to-date by listing recent options"
>>>>> while "b:v" for the bitrate is one example where it is recent and hence
>>>>> i
>>>>> asked what problems the guy saying "It seems to have been written by
>>>>> children four years" has
>>>>>
>>>>> and for the subject "documentation in spanish" i can only say "write
>>>>> one"
>>>>> -
>>>>> the language for technical documents in the IT is primary english (and
>>>>> no
>>>>> i
>>>>> am not a native english speaker)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ffmpeg-user mailing list
>>>>> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
>>>>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
>>>>>
>>>> understanding the documentation to broadcast a live video should do
>>>> the following
>>>
>>> Where is this written?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> >ffmpeg -i rtp://239.0.0.5:8208 -c copy -listen 1 -f mp4
>>>> http:localhost:80
>>>
>>> This is certainly wrong.
>>>
>>>> but it produces the error Could not write header for output file #0
>>>> (incorrect codec parameters ?): Invalid argument.
>>>> therefore this is due to a documentation error devido I follow the
>>>> steps as they appear only with the source and output ami interests me
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ffmpeg-user mailing list
>>>> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
>>>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ffmpeg-user mailing list
>>> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
>>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
>> is not wrong, if you look at the section vera protocols;
>>
>> ffmpeg -i somefile.ogg -c copy -listen 1 -f ogg http://server:port
>> this is to send a local file via http,therefore I would say to convey
>> the same way
>>
>> ffmpeg -i rtp://239.0.0.5:8208 -c copy -listen 1 -f mp4 http://localhost:80
>> therefore I repeat that this is an error in the documentation approach
>> as to what you say it is paramount,actually it is not, the real reason
>> that everything is in English is the supposed supremacy of the United
>> States, the other countries were allowed to dupe the smokescreen of
>> the United States
>
> Please feel free to translate or write new documentation if you do not
> like this one.
> Without Your help United States will remain in supremacy.
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
I said nothing of the members of the project, I do not care what keep
the project are all equibocaos, what I said was that America creates
all standards, the whole structure of how things should be done on the
Internet, do not write documentation because the original
documentation is wrong, then I write documentation also would have
them as it would be based on the original
More information about the ffmpeg-user
mailing list