[FFmpeg-user] side by side videos

[Lorenzo Perone]

Hi Michael,
it works!
Thanks a lot.
l.

Lorenzo Perone
photoblog: http://lorenzoperone.wordpress.com
website: http://blog.spaziogis.it
GEO+ geomatica in Italia *http://bit.ly/GEOplus*


2013/3/27 FFmichael <michael.rampe at gmail.com>

> Lorenzo Perone wrote
> > ....
> > Now they are 642px large and 1050px hight, both of them are 2:41 (mm:ss)
> > long.
> > Today I'm working in windows 7 64 bit using FFmpeg git-e0e8c20 64-bit
> > Static
> > and I've tried this string:
> >
> > ffmpeg.exe -i realtime_test1.mp4 -vf "[in] scale=642:1050, pad=1284:1050
> >> [left]; movie=realtime_test2.mp4, scale=642:1050; [left][right]
> >> overlay=642:0 [out]" Output.mp4
>
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> ...looks like your only problem is that you have not labelled the [right]
> branch before calling it in the overlay filter.
>
> Eg.
> ffmpeg.exe -i realtime_test1.mp4 -vf "[in] scale=642:1050, pad=1284:1050
> [left]; movie=realtime_test2.mp4, scale=642:1050[right]; [left][right]
> overlay=642:0 [out]" Output.mp4
>
> Otherwise, this looks fine to me.
>
> In regards to some of the other suggestions, I use filter_complex in
> "complex" situations where i need stream selection control or multiple
> outputs. Otherwise, this method is preferred by me as you do not have to
> worry about stream specifiers or mapping outputs.
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://ffmpeg-users.933282.n4.nabble.com/side-by-side-videos-tp4658071p4658138.html
> Sent from the FFmpeg-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
>