[FFmpeg-user] feature request: able to link against libjpeg
Roger Pack
rogerdpack2 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 11 00:34:55 CEST 2012
> That is a very disturbing sentence, given that the idea
> behind the whole FFmpeg project is to have the fastest
> decoders available.
>
> Could you post some performance tests?
Test, as in comparing FFmpeg to libjpeg-turbo, or libjpeg-turbo to
libjpeg [2]? I suppose if I integrated it I could compare it (has
libjpeg ever been integrated do you know?)...I suppose my goal was not
to disturb, but allow FFmpeg to be faster, if it's not already, than
libjpeg-turbo.
If libjpeg-turbo *is* faster than FFmpeg, one option might be to
incorporate it straight in (it has a BSD style license now apparently
[1]), though apparently it doesn't support all aspects of jpeg v8 or
something like that [3]
Thanks!
-roger-
[1] http://sourceforge.net/p/libjpeg-turbo/discussion/1086868/thread/a2806781
[2] http://www.libjpeg-turbo.org/About/Performance
[3] http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=459F80C4-D942-4F10-8C7B-ABBB642B8072%40users.sourceforge.net&forum_name=libjpeg-turbo-users
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libjpeg#libjpeg-turbo
More information about the ffmpeg-user
mailing list