[FFmpeg-user] ffmpeg/libx264 thread management

[dE .]

On 02/11/12 00:05, Jonathan Isom wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:45 AM, dE .<de.techno at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On 02/10/12 20:26, Michael Smithng wrote:
>>> Now that all of 'that's' out of the way dot dot dot
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any input on the actual question?
>>>
>>> On Feb 9, 2012, at 6:26 AM, John Dexter wrote:
>>>
>>>>> First remove your signature and re-post the question.
>>>>>
>>>>> This's a public mailing list.
>>>> Kind of immature to insist someone re-posts. It's not a school
>>>> playground. If the nonsense in the signature held any legal power
>>>> you'd already be caught even if he re-posted :)
>>>>
>>>> Tim maybe you'll have to post from your personal email if BBC is as
>>>> super-anal over this stuff as I hear!
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ffmpeg-user mailing list
>>>> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
>>>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ffmpeg-user mailing list
>>> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
>>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
>>
>> You're the same guy?
> Does it really matter who asked.  I would like to know as well about
> to the original question.
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ffmpeg-user mailing list
>> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> ffmpeg-user at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

Nice shouldn't matter if your system is not busy, also when encoding 
using x264, I don't see children of ffmpeg, but a single process; so I'm 
not sure what you mean.

If you want to force priority, you may use nice, renice.