[FFmpeg-user] mov [ProRes/pcm_s24le] -> mp4 same quality
tim.nicholson at bbc.co.uk
Fri Nov 18 15:56:03 CET 2011
On 18/11/11 14:39, HallMarc Websites wrote:
> AAC is not limited to -strict experimental because of any quality issue. My
> experience has shown that AAC produced a much better quality audio than
> libfaac. Even audiocoding.com states that currently AAC is much better than
I could find no reference to ffmpegs AAC on the audiocoding.com website.
Could you provide the link?
> I see some postings, maybe someone here that KNOWS can expound on it, that
> say libfaac/faac were removed from ffmpeg builds due to licensing issues.
"FAAC is based on the original ISO MPEG reference code. The changes to
this code are licensed under the LGPL license. The original license is
not compatible with the LGP..."
Since ffmpeg is LGPL I think you can see the issue.
> I've asked you once before and now I plead with you, stop posting garbage in
> this list. You are not helping anyone by misinforming them.
I find that comments by ffmpeg maintainers are rarely garbage, it is
usually the most technically accurate and they are under no obligation
to offer advice, so publicly ridiculing them is not likely to work in
> Marc Hall
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.
More information about the ffmpeg-user