[FFmpeg-soc] [soc]: r5663 - mms/mmst.c

Thilo Borgmann thilo.borgmann at googlemail.com
Sun Mar 14 13:22:35 CET 2010


Am 14.03.10 12:04, schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:23:42AM +0100, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
>> Am 14.03.10 02:15, schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
>>> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 02:40:25PM +0100, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
>>>> Am 13.03.10 14:26, schrieb Ronald S. Bultje:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 13, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Thilo Borgmann
>>>>> <thilo.borgmann at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Am 13.03.10 14:07, schrieb spyfeng:
>>>>>>> Author: spyfeng
>>>>>>> Date: Sat Mar 13 14:07:31 2010
>>>>>>> New Revision: 5663
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>>> remove "{" and "}" when return -1 directly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My latest news is to always use
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if () {
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> even for one-liners to reduce patch size.
>>>>>> Using
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if () {
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> } else
>>>>>> ... ;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> never was a valid choice and AFAIK it still is none.
>>>>>
>>>>> It reduces codesize by 1 line and is thus better.
>>>>>
>>>>> More specifically , I asked for it because this MMS patch is seriously
>>>>> massively huge and needs some fat trimming.
>>>>
>>>> I don't want to meddle in here too much and I understand that dilemma
>>>> but does this reason to avoid common patch rules?
>>>
>>> which rule?
>>
>> to use
>> if {
>> } else {
>> }
> 
> where is that rule from? or where is it written?

Well IIRC you advised me to use all brackets to reduce future patches.
And not using the mixed form was one of the first things I'd to change
in 2009...

http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2010-January/081702.html

-Thilo



More information about the FFmpeg-soc mailing list