[FFmpeg-soc] [QUESTION] Force more data to decode_frame()

Mohamed Naufal naufal11 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 11 22:52:50 CEST 2010


On 12 July 2010 00:36, Martin Storsjö <martin at martin.st> wrote:

[...]

>>
>> Think about remuxing (-acodec copy) and what you would store for each of
>> the cases above in a container that does require a integral number of frames
>> at a time
>
> For that case, I guess only the two first suggestions are viable
> alternatives. For the parser solution suggestion, I'm not totally sure
> where one would signal that it is needed. Normally, this is set with a
> flag in the demuxer, right? Mohamed, is the file format you're reading
> this for any standard file format that one finds in practice when dealing
> with this codec, or is it only something that you're using for testing? If

It is a test vector included with the spec (with frames simply placed
one after the other).
So I'll go with the parser solution.

Thanks
Naufal

> it's a full proper file format in itself, a demuxer probably is the better
> choice, otherwise a parser may be more useful when dealing with the same
> data format in other containers.
>
> // Martin
> _______________________________________________
> FFmpeg-soc mailing list
> FFmpeg-soc at mplayerhq.hu
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
>
>


More information about the FFmpeg-soc mailing list