[FFmpeg-soc] libavfilter audio work - qualification task

[Baptiste Coudurier]

On 04/05/2010 12:19 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:11:26PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>> On date Monday 2010-04-05 19:32:59 +0200, Reimar Döffinger encoded:
>>> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 07:11:50PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>>>>> For the deinterlace filter, do we want just a vf_* wrapper for
>>>>> imgconvert functions or should the code be ported to the
>>>>> vf_deinterlace filter?
>>>>
>>>> It should be ported, lavfi should not depend on lavc (that is it
>>>> should be usable without any libavcodec installed).
>>>
>>> Uh, any of the advanced deinterlace filters and some more of MPlayer's
>>> filters depend on lavc.
>>> I don't think Michael will accept if you propose to duplicate half the
>>> snow encoder in lavfi.
>>> So except for basic functionality I don't see that much point in avoid
>>> a dependency on lavc if it duplicates more than just a few lines of
>>> code.
>>
>> Yes of course some filter may depend on lavc. As for what regards the
>> deinterlacing implemented in imgconvert.c it looked to me simple
>> enough to not require to add a dependancy just for that, also I think
>> that feature (as well as cropping/padding in lavc) is going to be
>> deprecated.
>
> Sure, I don't object to your "conclusion", just the reasoning you gave
> seemed not quite right to me, the above seems like a better one to me.

Well, yadif should be ported :)

-- 
Baptiste COUDURIER
Key fingerprint                 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
FFmpeg maintainer                                  http://www.ffmpeg.org