[FFmpeg-soc] some questions about swscale

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 08:29:00PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Replying here just for the record.
> 
> Keiji Costantini wrote:
> > I took a look at sequent files in libswscale directory:
> > 
> > Makefile
> > swscale.h
> > swscale.c
> > swscale_internal.h
> > swscale-example.c
> > 
> > During the project I am told to *not* read the file "yuv2rgb.c". If 
> > there are other files not to read, it would be nice to know that. For 
> > now, I'm checking that every file I open contains an LGPL header or the 
> > permission of utilization under LGPL (as swscale.c).
> 
> I'm not sure, Michael I guess that this is the only one taboo (I'll try 
> to split out the stuff he could read to ease the work)

The GPL->LGPL rewrite was not my idea so ill leave this entirely to you
luca, to figure out what needs to be rewritten, what can be looked at and
what not.


> 
> > regarding "swscale-example.c" and "swscale_internal.h"
> > swscale-example.c includes swscale_internal.h which, according to 
> > Makefile, is not public. Could test function inside "swscale-example.c" 
> > be split from the file to have a clean "example" about using swscale 
> > (Just took about 1/2 hour to understand why it is there)?
> 
> I'd like to have the test routine split and have a test target as well. 
> That could be one of the first commit.

I assume you guys mean with "split" to outcomment sws_format_name()?
If so yes i also want it "splited".

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Complexity theory is the science of finding the exact solution to an
approximation. Benchmarking OTOH is finding an approximation of the exact
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-soc/attachments/20080504/2cf74ceb/attachment.pgp>