[FFmpeg-soc] [FFmpeg-devel] [Patch]GSoC 2008 qualification task TS Muxer

[zhentan feng]

2008/3/25, Baptiste Coudurier <baptiste.coudurier at smartjog.com>:
> Hi,
>
>
>  zhentan feng wrote:
>  > 2008/3/25, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>:
>  >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:57:16AM +0800, zhentan feng wrote:
>  >>  > 2008/3/25, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>:
>  >>
>  >> [...]
>  >>
>
> >>  I assume these are bugfixes for the TS muxer? We certainly do want them but
>  >>  they must be in a seperate patch. Not in the patch spliting the common PES
>  >>  code out.
>  >
>  > yes, these are bugfixes.But it was modified by the student last year,not me.
>
>
> Some are, and I fixed pcr computation.
>
>
>  > The situation is that I just download the codes from
>  > svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/soc/dvbmuxer
>  > and I got 4 files mpegtsenc.c, mpegenc.c,mpegpesenc.c,mpegpes.h,which
>  > are already bug
>  > fixed for mpegtsenc.c against the svn-devl codes, and already
>  > extracted some common codes.
>  >
>  > According to  baptiste.coudurie wrote in the early mail,I have just
>  > extracted more common codes and do not do any functional changes.
>  > As qualification task, I think I will do the next 2 things:
>  >
>  > 1.Test my codes , confirm it works correctly.
>  > 2.Create different patches for different situation:
>  >    i) create patches against  svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/soc/dvbmuxer to
>  > show my changes from the last year's students.
>
>
> Yes, current TS muxer in soc is working, however mpegtsenc.c and
>  mpegenc.c in soc svn shares too much code, you can see that already.
>  Im not sure if code from ffmpeg svn mpegenc.c can be extracted right
>  now, since It might not fit soc svn mpegtsenc.c code.
>
>  First work on soc svn, and adapt mpegenc.c or mpegtsenc.c code if
>  needed. See flush_packet for example, it contains much common code. You
>  have to decide if it is worth to merge both functions and handle TS and
>  PS cases, or just rewrite a very small flush_packet for TS.
>  'mpegpesenc.c' in soc svn should contain common functions, it already
>  contains ff_pes_get_nb_frames for example, which is used by both muxer
>  in soc svn.
>

hi,
I have modified the 4 files and copy them to currently svn-devel codes
repo,overwrote mpegtsenc.c and mpegenc.c in /libavformat folder and
add mpegpesenc.c ,mpegpes.h.

Then I do "make"  to complie the changed files and have fixed some errors.
Now, all the 4 files can be complie successfully.
The patch against svn-soc is attached below.

I know the code from svn-soc is bugfixes.
So,I want to know how to test my changes are right and do not break
the function of the mpegtsenc.c and mpegenc.c against svn-soc?
what's the sign of the codes can work correctly?
Are there any sample files to play or some tools to judge it?

Thanks for anyone could help me~


>
>  >    ii) create patches against svn-devel codes to show the bug fixed
>  > and  common codes extracted from mpegtsenc.c and mpegenc.c to
>  > mpegpesenc.c.
>  >
>  > am I right?
>
>
> Yes.
>
>  [...]
>
>  --
>
> Baptiste COUDURIER                              GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
>  SMARTJOG SAS                                     http://www.smartjog.com
>  Key fingerprint                 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
>  Phone: +33 1 49966312
>  _______________________________________________
>  FFmpeg-soc mailing list
>
> FFmpeg-soc at mplayerhq.hu
>  https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
>


-- 
Best wishes~
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: TSMuxer_soc_pactch.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 29565 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-soc/attachments/20080326/960072b8/attachment.obj>