[FFmpeg-soc] Bitstream writer from vorbis_enc.c
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni at gmx.at
Sun Aug 24 13:43:20 CEST 2008
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 01:34:53PM +0200, Bartlomiej Wolowiec wrote:
> Sunday 24 August 2008 05:00:43 Michael Niedermayer napisał(a):
> > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 01:56:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Wolowiec wrote:
> > > Saturday 23 August 2008 03:33:27 Michael Niedermayer napisał(a):
> > > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:31:48AM +0200, Bartlomiej Wolowiec wrote:
> > > > > In nellymoserenc.c is a duplicate of bitstream writer code from
> > > > > vorbis_enc.c. How should I remove this duplicate? Add to bitstream.h
> > > > > this code and make activation by BITSTREAM_WRITER_LE available?
> > > >
> > > > The put_bits code in vorbis_enc.c is extreemly poorly written and it
> > > > needs be cleaned up before it can be used by another encoder.
> > > > Actually i wonder how this code managed to get into svn ...
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > I tried to wrote patch to bitstream.h. I hope that it's better than
> > > previous code.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bartlomiej Wolowiec
> > >
> > > Index: bitstream.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- bitstream.h (wersja 14909)
> > > +++ bitstream.h (kopia robocza)
> > > @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@
> > > #ifdef ALT_BITSTREAM_WRITER
> > > align_put_bits(s);
> > > #else
> > > +#ifndef BITSTREAM_WRITER_LE
> > > s->bit_buf<<= s->bit_left;
> > > while (s->bit_left < 32) {
> > > /* XXX: should test end of buffer */
> > > @@ -130,6 +131,14 @@
> > > s->bit_buf<<=8;
> > > s->bit_left+=8;
> > > }
> > > +#else
> > > + while (s->bit_left < 32) {
> > > + /* XXX: should test end of buffer */
> > > + *s->buf_ptr++=s->bit_buf;
> > > + s->bit_buf>>=8;
> > > + s->bit_left+=8;
> > > + }
> > > +#endif
> >
> > theres some common code between if and else
> >
> > > s->bit_left=32;
> > > s->bit_buf=0;
> > > #endif
> > > @@ -190,6 +199,7 @@
> > >
> > > // printf("n=%d value=%x cnt=%d buf=%x\n", n, value, bit_cnt,
> > > bit_buf); /* XXX: optimize */
> > > +#ifndef BITSTREAM_WRITER_LE
> > > if (n < bit_left) {
> > > bit_buf = (bit_buf<<n) | value;
> > > bit_left-=n;
> > > @@ -210,7 +220,27 @@
> > > bit_left+=32 - n;
> > > bit_buf = value;
> > > }
> > > +#else // BITSTREAM_WRITER_LE
> > > + bit_buf |= value << (32 - bit_left);
> > > + if (n >= bit_left) {
> > > +#ifdef UNALIGNED_STORES_ARE_BAD
> > > + if (3 & (intptr_t) s->buf_ptr) {
> > > + s->buf_ptr[0] = bit_buf;
> > > + s->buf_ptr[1] = bit_buf >> 8;
> > > + s->buf_ptr[2] = bit_buf >> 16;
> > > + s->buf_ptr[3] = bit_buf >> 24;
> > > + } else
> > > +#endif
> > > + *(uint32_t *)s->buf_ptr = le2me_32(bit_buf);
> > > + s->buf_ptr+=4;
> > >
> > >
> > > + //FIXME: value>>32 == value... ?!
> >
> > value>>32 == undefined
> >
> > [...]
>
> Ok. Here is improved patch.
[...]
> @@ -210,6 +218,24 @@
> bit_left+=32 - n;
> bit_buf = value;
> }
> +#else // BITSTREAM_WRITER_LE
> + bit_buf |= value << (32 - bit_left);
> + if (n >= bit_left) {
> +#ifdef UNALIGNED_STORES_ARE_BAD
> + if (3 & (intptr_t) s->buf_ptr) {
> + s->buf_ptr[0] = bit_buf ;
> + s->buf_ptr[1] = bit_buf >> 8;
> + s->buf_ptr[2] = bit_buf >> 16;
> + s->buf_ptr[3] = bit_buf >> 24;
> + } else
> +#endif
> + *(uint32_t *)s->buf_ptr = le2me_32(bit_buf);
> + s->buf_ptr+=4;
> + bit_buf = (bit_left==32)?0:value >> bit_left;
> + bit_left+=32;
> + }
> + bit_left-=n;
> +#endif // BITSTREAM_WRITER_LE
I think #ifdef + #else is clearer than #ifndef + #else
also if you do add comments to #else and #endif, make sure they are
correct, the ones above are not. The comment needed for a endif
after #ifndef is different than #ifdef also it makes a difference
if a #else was in between.
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in
ancient Greek republics: Freedom for slave owners. -- Vladimir Lenin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-soc/attachments/20080824/1166d086/attachment.pgp>
More information about the FFmpeg-soc
mailing list