[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Subtitle Filtering Ramp-Up
softworkz .
softworkz at hotmail.com
Thu Jun 5 03:44:38 EEST 2025
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of softworkz .
> Sent: Mittwoch, 4. Juni 2025 20:35
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Subtitle Filtering Ramp-Up
>
> Objections Summary
> ==================
>
>
> Here's a summary of objections made so far:
>
>
> Lynne
> -----
>
> - Not using picture buffers for subtitle data
> It's not impossible, just doesn't make much sense
> I said there wasn't anybody against it anymore in 2022.
> We can dig up previous conversations, or we can just let
> the TC decide about it
Here's the thread and specifically the message about the reasonings in
this regard:
https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-August/300740.html
> Lynne & Hendrik
> ---------------
>
> - Claimed that AVFrame's timing fields would be sufficient
> They can take my $1000 challenge to prove it
Here, Hendrik had asked for an explanation for the extra time fields:
https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-October/303282.html
My reply:
https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-October/303285.html
And I had asked later whether it's clarified for him:
https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-October/303371.html
==> No response
------------
In this conversation, I had stated that no unaddressed objections were
remaining:
https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-August/300593.html
I had also said (about the timing fields):
> I had explained the reasons and in conversation on IRC, Lynne was
> no longer insisting on this AFAIR.
I still have the log of those conversations. It's just a lot of text
to go through.
But if Lynne wants to insist that it was any different, then I can
post the full IRC log somewhere.
-----------------------------------
Anton said he would review it:
https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-August/300729.html
I posted the explanation he was asking for in a reply.
He never responded.
I sent 4 or 5 reminders over the subsequent weeks and he didn't respond.
-------------
There were more messages where it was talked about whether any objections
would be remaining and there weren't any responses.
That's the evidence for why I said there were no more objections.
Best regards
sw
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list