[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Subtitle Filtering Ramp-Up

[Devlist Archive]

Which code branch does the patchset being discussed live in?

Zach

On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 10:15 AM Devlist Archive <devlist at rlb.org> wrote:

> > Given the preceding conversations, it is pretty safe to assume
> > that these comments are based on personal sentiments rather than
> > technical expertise.
>
> While there may be truth to that, it isn't helpful to discount objections
> without a chance to substantiate them.  If the person objecting chooses to
> not participate in the conversation then the objection cannot be properly
> accommodated.  Any objection that can or should derail progress on a
> patchset should be addressed if it has substance that will affect the
> codebase.
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 10:07 AM softworkz . <
> softworkz-at-hotmail.com at ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
>> Nicolas
>> > George
>> > Sent: Dienstag, 3. Juni 2025 18:44
>> > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
>> >
>> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Subtitle Filtering Ramp-Up
>> >
>> > Lynne (HE12025-06-04):
>> > > You don't get to say "oh, there were no more objections, so it was
>> fine" or
>> > > "the use is evident" after the mess that your original patchsets were.
>> > >
>> > > You're still not using the native time fields, nor the packet
>> buffers, which
>> > > is a very hard NAK from me.
>> >
>> > Indeed. And not just that. The whole series had many deep logic flaws
>> > that made it a dead end without a complete rewrite. I explained at the
>> > time, and “softworkz” was almost as rude then than they are now. My
>> > patience if more than exhausted, I will not explain again.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > --
>> >   Nicolas George
>> > _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> Given the preceding conversations, it is pretty safe to assume
>> that these comments are based on personal sentiments rather than
>> technical expertise.
>>
>>
>> Reference:
>>
>> https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2025-June/thread.html
>> (entire thread)
>>
>> sw
>> _______________________________________________
>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
>> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
>> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>>
>