[FFmpeg-devel] [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org

[softworkz .]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of
> Martin Storsjö
> Sent: Dienstag, 15. Juli 2025 20:09
> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-
> devel at ffmpeg.org>
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [POLL] [VOTE] code.ffmpeg.org
> 

[..]

> like a reasonable way to me. But the end goal should be one canonical
> tool/process, not many in parallel IMO.

+1

I'd rather stick to the ML - no matter how much I dislike it - than having
split communication and needing to visit and work at two places.
For a test/transition phase it's fine of course.

Best regards,
sw