[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] fate: skip encoded output hashing for tests that depend on zlib
James Almer
jamrial at gmail.com
Sun Oct 20 00:25:38 EEST 2024
On 10/19/2024 6:07 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Oct 2024, James Almer wrote:
>
>> On 10/19/2024 11:04 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>>> On Sat, 19 Oct 2024, James Almer wrote:
>>>
>>>> As there's no guarantee that the output will be exactly the same
>>>> across implementations,
>>>> just don't test it at all.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial at gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> All tests covered now. Do we go this route, or update the zlib
>>>> version of the
>>>> failing FATE machines?
>>>
>>> I would say that requiring an upgrade isn't reasonsble here.
>>>
>>> This isn't only about fate.ffmpeg.org, but also about any developer -
>>> and user compiling ffmpeg for themselves - to be able to verify that
>>> their build is good.
>>>
>>> If we go down the "enforce upgrades" path, we pretty much force all
>>> users to upgrade or stop using zlib. For still supported, not
>>> entirely ancient distributions like Ubuntu 20.04, that seems a bit
>>> harsh for something which is mainly an issue with our tests.
>> But are those distros affected? Which zlib builds are faulty?
>
> I don't remember exactly which versions that are affected (Ramiro
> pointed it out in some message), but at least Ubuntu 20.04 is affected.
Ok, if the zlib shipped by Ubuntu 20.04 is affected then yeah, we can't
require a newer version until it goes EOL next April.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20241019/95e1c630/attachment.sig>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list