[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/fifo: Remove (a)fifo filters
Muhammad Faiz
mfcc64 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 9 03:08:18 EET 2024
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 10:30 PM Paul B Mahol <onemda at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 4:18 PM Muhammad Faiz <mfcc64 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 5:40 PM Andreas Rheinhardt <
> > andreas.rheinhardt at outlook.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Muhammad Faiz:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:58 PM Andreas Rheinhardt <
> > > > andreas.rheinhardt at outlook.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Andreas Rheinhardt:
> > > >>> Obsolete since 4ca1fb9d2a91757c8c4c34dd456abf340e3f765f.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt at outlook.com>
> > > >>> ---
> > > >>> doc/filters.texi | 9 ---
> > > >>> libavfilter/Makefile | 1 -
> > > >>> libavfilter/allfilters.c | 2 -
> > > >>> libavfilter/fifo.c | 165
> > ---------------------------------------
> > > >>> 4 files changed, 177 deletions(-)
> > > >>> delete mode 100644 libavfilter/fifo.c
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> Will apply in a few days unless there are objections.
> > > >>
> > > >> - Andreas
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > This breaks backward compatibility.
> > > >
> > > > Please revert.
> > > >
> > > > Thank's.
> > >
> > > What breaks that can't simply be fixed by removing the (a)fifo filter
> > > from the filterchain?
> > >
> > > - Andreas
> > >
> > >
> > I use afifo to optimize memory usage.
> >
>
> That statement sync with reality is questionable, fifo filters were mainly
> used before .activate was added,
> for cases filters used >1 inputs. Now they should be irrelevant, unless
> there are bugs in code than this filters just hide more bugs.
>
Yes, I've used it before .activate was added, and it worked, and still
works.
Although maybe the bugs have been fixed by .activate, what's wrong if
(a)fifo still exist?
Thank's
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list