[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: remove the QOA decoder
James Almer
jamrial at gmail.com
Fri Dec 22 15:09:01 EET 2023
On 12/21/2023 5:05 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 8:43 PM Tomas Härdin <git at haerdin.se> wrote:
>
>> ons 2023-12-20 klockan 20:11 +0100 skrev Michael Niedermayer:
>>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 05:57:40PM +0100, Tomas Härdin wrote:
>>>> tis 2023-12-19 klockan 15:02 +0100 skrev Nicolas George:
>>> [...]
>>>> [...] , but every line of code
>>>> carries with it a non-zero maintenance burden
>>>
>>> Assuming you mean with "non-zero" a "larger than zero" maintenance
>>> burden
>>>
>>> then we can proof this to be false
>>
>> Doubt
>>
>>> What iam trying to say is, the maintaince burden resulting from a
>>> change
>>> is complex
>>
>> Indeed
>>
>>> In this specific case here we have a patch proposing the removial of
>>> a decoder
>>> missing a test.
>>> Its easy to say the burden is less when the decoder is removed
>>> But its author recently left the project too
>>
>> This is one problem. But the careless attitude to shoving more features
>> into the codebase is far more serious. Every line of code is a CVE
>> waiting to happen. Apparently this is a difficult thing to grasp for
>> some contributors. It's an attitude I expect only from junior
>> developers.
>>
>> Ensuring C code is correct and safe is *hard*. I have spent time
>> formally verifying embedded C code for spaceflight. The lessons learned
>> from this has made me supremely suspicious of cowboy coding.
>>
>> I have raised this issue multiple times in this project to no avail. I
>> do not expect things to change.
>>
>
> Say what serious feature you contributed ? - Nothing.
First of all, this was completely uncalled for. Second, mxf support in
lavf is pretty much thanks to him.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list