[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] avcodec/atrac3plus: reorder channels to match the output layout

[James Almer]

On 10/31/2022 7:13 PM, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> James Almer:
>> The order in which the channels are coded in the bitstream do not always follow
>> the native, bitmask-based order of channels both signaled by the WAV container
>> and forced by this same decoder. This is the case with layouts containing an
>> LFE channel, as it's always coded last.
>>
>> Fixes ticket #9964.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamrial at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   libavcodec/atrac3plusdec.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libavcodec/atrac3plusdec.c b/libavcodec/atrac3plusdec.c
>> index ee71645a3c..9e12f21930 100644
>> --- a/libavcodec/atrac3plusdec.c
>> +++ b/libavcodec/atrac3plusdec.c
>> @@ -48,6 +48,17 @@
>>   #include "atrac.h"
>>   #include "atrac3plus.h"
>>   
>> +static uint8_t channel_map[8][8] = {
>> +    { 0, },
>> +    { 0, 1, },
>> +    { 0, 1, 2, },
>> +    { 0, 1, 2, 3, },
>> +    { 0, },
>> +    { 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 3, },
>> +    { 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 3, },
>> +    { 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 3, },
>> +};
>> +
>>   typedef struct ATRAC3PContext {
>>       GetBitContext gb;
>>       AVFloatDSPContext *fdsp;
>> @@ -378,7 +389,7 @@ static int atrac3p_decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, AVFrame *frame,
>>                             channels_to_process, avctx);
>>   
>>           for (i = 0; i < channels_to_process; i++)
>> -            memcpy(samples_p[out_ch_index + i], ctx->outp_buf[i],
>> +            memcpy(samples_p[channel_map[frame->ch_layout.nb_channels - 1][out_ch_index + i]], ctx->outp_buf[i],
>>                      ATRAC3P_FRAME_SAMPLES * sizeof(**samples_p));
>>   
>>           ch_block++;
> 
> Looking at the last two entries, it seems to me that you simply used the
> numerical values of the AV_CHAN_* constants, i.e. as if you wanted to
> write { AV_CHAN_FRONT_LEFT, AV_CHAN_FRONT_RIGHT, AV_CHAN_FRONT_CENTER,
> AV_CHAN_BACK_LEFT, AV_CHAN_BACK_RIGHT, AV_CHAN_SIDE_LEFT,
> AV_CHAN_SIDE_RIGHT, AV_CHAN_LOW_FREQUENCY } for the last entry. This is
> wrong, as it conflates the enum AVChannel domain with the index domain;
> it will segfault for 6.1 and 7.1, because there are no data planes with
> indices 8, 9 and 10 in the output frame.
> 
> The array for 6.1 is { 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 3 }, for 7.1 it is { 0, 1, 2,
> 4, 5, 6, 7, 3, } (presuming that your first patch was right). The
> derivation for 6.1 is as follows: The first channel in atrac is FL,
> which is also the first channel in AV_CHANNEL_LAYOUT_6POINT1_BACK. So
> the first entry is 0; the next channel is FR which is the second channel
> in AV_CHANNEL_LAYOUT_6POINT1_BACK, so the second entry is 1. The next
> atrac entry is FC, which is also the next entry in
> AV_CHANNEL_LAYOUT_6POINT1_BACK, so the next entry is 2. The next atrac
> entry is BL, which is not the next channel in
> AV_CHANNEL_LAYOUT_6POINT1_BACK (which is lfe), but the one after that.
> So the next entry is four. Similarly, the next entry is five. The atrac
> entry after that is BC, which is the next (and last) entry of
> AV_CHANNEL_LAYOUT_6POINT1_BACK and has index six. It doesn't matter for
> this that there are several channels in enum AVChannel between BR and
> BC, as these channels are not present in AV_CHANNEL_LAYOUT_6POINT1_BACK
> (it would also not matter if there were any gaps in the values of the
> AV_CHAN_* constants in between). The next (and last) atrac entry is LFE,
> which is the fourth channel in AV_CHANNEL_LAYOUT_6POINT1_BACK and
> therefore has index 3.
> 
> Is it really absolutely guaranteed that atrac only has one channel
> layout per channel count? It seems to me that adding a const uint8_t
> *channel_map to the context that gets set like ctx->channel_map = (const
> uint8_t[]){ 0, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 3 } (for 6.1) would be simpler.

Unless i'm missing something, this would be local to set_channel_params().

> 
> - Andreas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> 
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".