[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc/dovi_rpu: Fix UB for possible left shift of negative values
Thilo Borgmann
thilo.borgmann at mail.de
Mon Jun 20 12:06:45 EEST 2022
Am 16.06.22 um 13:19 schrieb Thilo Borgmann:
> Am 16.06.22 um 12:40 schrieb Andreas Rheinhardt:
>> Thilo Borgmann:
>>> Am 16.06.22 um 12:13 schrieb Andreas Rheinhardt:
>>>> Thilo Borgmann:
>>>>> diff --git a/libavcodec/dovi_rpu.c b/libavcodec/dovi_rpu.c
>>>>> index a87562c8a3..833ce9e705 100644
>>>>> --- a/libavcodec/dovi_rpu.c
>>>>> +++ b/libavcodec/dovi_rpu.c
>>>>> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static inline uint64_t get_ue_coef(GetBitContext
>>>>> *gb, const AVDOVIRpuDataHeader
>>>>> case RPU_COEFF_FIXED:
>>>>> ipart = get_ue_golomb_long(gb);
>>>>> fpart.u32 = get_bits_long(gb, hdr->coef_log2_denom);
>>>>> - return (ipart << hdr->coef_log2_denom) + fpart.u32;
>>>>> + return ipart * (1 << hdr->coef_log2_denom) + fpart.u32;
>>>>> case RPU_COEFF_FLOAT:
>>>>> fpart.u32 = get_bits_long(gb, 32);
>>>>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static inline int64_t get_se_coef(GetBitContext
>>>>> *gb, const AVDOVIRpuDataHeader *
>>>>> case RPU_COEFF_FIXED:
>>>>> ipart = get_se_golomb_long(gb);
>>>>> fpart.u32 = get_bits_long(gb, hdr->coef_log2_denom);
>>>>> - return (ipart << hdr->coef_log2_denom) + fpart.u32;
>>>>> + return ipart * (1 << hdr->coef_log2_denom) + fpart.u32;
>>>>> case RPU_COEFF_FLOAT:
>>>>> fpart.u32 = get_bits_long(gb, 32);
>>>>
>>>> coef_log2_denom can be in the range 13..32. This means that 1 <<
>>>> hdr->coef_log2_denom can be UB (namely if coef_log2_denom is 31 or 32
>>>> for ordinary 32 bit ints); this time it is not UB that happens to work
>>>> as expected, because 1 << 32 will be 0 or 1 (depending upon the system)
>>>> and not 2^32. In case of get_ue_coef() this actually adds UB to
>>>> otherwise fine code.
>>>
>>> So 1LL it needs to be, not? Am I still missing something?
>>>
>>
>> This version should not add new UB.
>> I btw don't get why you are changing get_ue_coef() at all: It's fine
>> as-is; consistency should only trump when the choice is between several
>> equally good alternatives which is IMO not true here. (The reason that C
>> makes left shifts of negative values UB is because of non-two's
>> complement systems, so it is unfortunate for a project like FFmpeg that
>> requires two's complement that it has to workaround this restriction by
>> using a * (1 << b).)
>
> Just overthinking consistency, I guess.
>
> v4 changes get_se_coef() only.
Pushing soon if there are no more comments.
Thanks,
Thilo
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list