[FFmpeg-devel] The case for a good string API
Nicolas George
george at nsup.org
Thu Jun 16 18:47:40 EEST 2022
Stefano Sabatini (12022-06-15):
> Hi, and sorry for the long delay (I'll comment soon about the AVWriter
> API).
Thanks. I was starting to despair that somebody else gives a damn about
it.
> Before jumping to the discussion, probably it's good to think a bit
> about the bprint.h API and its limitations (the ones which come to mind
> are: no errors in case of truncation, and possible inefficiency due to
> the realloc). So while it covers the case for small strings (and it's
> not that bad IMO from the API point of view), probably it's underkill
> for data serialization.
>
> Do you have more in mind about its limitations?
The limitations of BPrint were one of the motivations to start working
on this. But I am not sure what you are referring to exactly.
BPrint already has a means to test for truncation in case of memory
allocation failure. I tried to make it a little harder to forget with
dynamic AVWriter, but it is a fine line between harder to forget and
annoying to use.
Regarding realloc(), I am even more confused: we cannot avoid a dynamic
allocation if the string is larger than the initial buffer. But AVWriter
goes a step further in that direction: if you want to write to a file or
to the network, it can do so on the fly, without using a dynamic buffer.
> Also, is the new API supposed to be a replacement for AVBprint or is
> it supposed to live in parallel with it (to serve different purposes)?
Eventually, I would like to have all useful features of BPrint in the
dynamic buffer AVWriter and deprecate BPrint, since that was written in
part to learn and do BPrint better.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list