[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] swscale: add NV16 input/output

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 04:11:10PM +0200, Matthieu Bouron wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:13 PM Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 10:33:37PM +0200, Matthieu Bouron wrote:
> > > ---
> > >  libswscale/input.c                       | 1 +
> > >  libswscale/utils.c                       | 1 +
> > >  libswscale/version.h                     | 2 +-
> > >  tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-nv16       | 1 +
> > >  tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-copy       | 1 +
> > >  tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-crop       | 1 +
> > >  tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-field      | 1 +
> > >  tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-fieldorder | 1 +
> > >  tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-hflip      | 1 +
> > >  tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-il         | 1 +
> > >  tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-null       | 1 +
> > >  tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-pad        | 1 +
> > >  tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-scale      | 1 +
> > >  tests/ref/fate/filter-pixfmts-vflip      | 1 +
> > >  14 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/filter-pixdesc-nv16
> >
> >
> Sorry for the late reply
> 
> 
> > has this been tested ? (various scaled and non scaled) variants ?
> >
> 
> I only tested the non scaled variant using the command line doing multiple
> round trips to/from nv16.
> Is there a particular test procedure to validate every variants ?

you can test manually or use something like
libswscale/tests/swscale.c

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The educated differ from the uneducated as much as the living from the
dead. -- Aristotle 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20220611/7e8c47fc/attachment.sig>