[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/motion_est: Fix xy indexing on range violation in ff_get_best_fcode()
Michael Niedermayer
michael at niedermayer.cc
Wed Feb 9 11:36:00 EET 2022
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 03:39:20AM +0100, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer:
> > This codepath seems untested, no testcases change
> >
> > Found-by: <mkver>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael at niedermayer.cc>
> > ---
> > libavcodec/motion_est.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/libavcodec/motion_est.c b/libavcodec/motion_est.c
> > index 9c548c1567..4cf1afe888 100644
> > --- a/libavcodec/motion_est.c
> > +++ b/libavcodec/motion_est.c
> > @@ -1621,9 +1621,11 @@ int ff_get_best_fcode(MpegEncContext * s, int16_t (*mv_table)[2], int type)
> > fcode_tab[my + MAX_MV]);
> > int j;
> >
> > - if(mx >= range || mx < -range ||
> > - my >= range || my < -range)
> > - continue;
> > + if (mx >= range || mx < -range ||
> > + my >= range || my < -range) {
> > + xy++;
> > + continue;
> > + }
> >
> > for(j=0; j<fcode && j<8; j++){
> > if(s->pict_type==AV_PICTURE_TYPE_B || s->current_picture.mc_mb_var[xy] < s->current_picture.mb_var[xy])
>
> It would be simpler if you added the xy++ to the outer-for-loop and
> removed the other xy++.
that leaves the indention wrong. Will move the xy in the for loop and
fix the indention in a separate commit
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
When you are offended at any man's fault, turn to yourself and study your
own failings. Then you will forget your anger. -- Epictetus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20220209/acda0cde/attachment.sig>
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list