[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 5/7] avcodec/mediacodecenc: remove the strategy to create DTS
"zhilizhao(赵志立)"
quinkblack at foxmail.com
Tue Dec 13 04:55:27 EET 2022
> On Dec 12, 2022, at 23:28, Tomas Härdin <git at haerdin.se> wrote:
>
> ons 2022-12-07 klockan 17:31 +0800 skrev Zhao Zhili:
>> From: Zhao Zhili <zhilizhao at tencent.com>
>>
>> Use input PTS as DTS has multiple problems:
>> 1. If there is no reordering, it's better to just use the output
>> PTS as DTS, since encoder may change the timestamp value (do it
>> on purpose or rounding error).
>>
>> 2. If there is reordering, input PTS should be shift a few frames
>> as DTS to satisfy the requirement of PTS >= DTS. I can't find a
>> reliable way to determine how many frames to be shift. For example,
>> we don't known if the encoder use hierarchical B frames. The
>> max_num_reorder_frames can be get from VUI, but VUI is optional.
>>
>> 3. Encoder dropping frames makes the case worse. Android has an
>> BITRATE_MODE_CBR_FD option to allow it explicitly.
>
> Don't we already have code to parse this stuff from h.264 streams?
We have code to parse max_num_reorder_frames, if the stream contains
the field.
We have some code to generate/guess DTS but doesn’t work reliably for
H.264/H.265. I guess it’s hard, if not impossible. We don’t know the
prediction structures. Use encoder’s input PTS as DTS works for some
transport protocols like RTP, and MP4 with negative_cts_offsets,
otherwise it’s broken due to PTS >= DTS.
If we can and decided to implement such algorithm, it should go in
a higher level, so remux raw stream works better.
>
> /Tomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list