[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avformat/imfdec: check track valid before use it

[Pierre-Anthony Lemieux]

Since we are protecting against the algorithm within
get_next_track_with_minimum_timestamp() return NULL, should this patch
also include immediately returning from imf_read_packet() if
get_next_track_with_minimum_timestamp() returns NULL?

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 7:53 PM Steven Liu <lq at chinaffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
> fix CID: 1512414
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Liu <lq at chinaffmpeg.org>
> ---
>  libavformat/imfdec.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavformat/imfdec.c b/libavformat/imfdec.c
> index 5bbe7a53f8..a97dcc3b8b 100644
> --- a/libavformat/imfdec.c
> +++ b/libavformat/imfdec.c
> @@ -697,8 +697,9 @@ static IMFVirtualTrackPlaybackCtx *get_next_track_with_minimum_timestamp(AVForma
>          }
>      }
>
> -    av_log(s, AV_LOG_DEBUG, "Found next track to read: %d (timestamp: %lf / %lf)\n",
> -           track->index, av_q2d(track->current_timestamp), av_q2d(minimum_timestamp));
> +    if (track)
> +        av_log(s, AV_LOG_DEBUG, "Found next track to read: %d (timestamp: %lf / %lf)\n",
> +               track->index, av_q2d(track->current_timestamp), av_q2d(minimum_timestamp));
>      return track;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.25.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".