[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffprobe: restore reporting error code for failed inputs
Gyan Doshi
ffmpeg at gyani.pro
Wed Aug 17 14:19:37 EEST 2022
Pushed as
d5544f6457ad06987311beda0e4b7c08bf52915c to master
and
4e4cc6e56a899f6b4302e80dbcd6b4462f340905 to 5.1
On 2022-08-17 12:43 pm, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-08-17 12:37 pm, Marton Balint wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 17 Aug 2022, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2022-08-17 04:36 am, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>>>> On date Tuesday 2022-08-16 00:04:10 +0530, Gyan Doshi wrote:
>>>>> c11fb46731 led to a regression whereby the return code for missing
>>>>> input or input probe is overridden by writer close return code and
>>>>> hence not conveyed in the exit code.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fftools/ffprobe.c | 6 +++++-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Affects 5.1 so will need to be backported there.
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fftools/ffprobe.c b/fftools/ffprobe.c
>>>>> index ad633ccc44..8983dc28cc 100644
>>>>> --- a/fftools/ffprobe.c
>>>>> +++ b/fftools/ffprobe.c
>>>>> @@ -4032,7 +4032,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>>> WriterContext *wctx;
>>>>> char *buf;
>>>>> char *w_name = NULL, *w_args = NULL;
>>>>> - int ret, i;
>>>>> + int ret, input_ret, i;
>>>>>
>>>>> init_dynload();
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -4156,10 +4156,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>>> show_error(wctx, ret);
>>>>> }
>>>>> + input_ret = ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> writer_print_section_footer(wctx);
>>>>> ret = writer_close(&wctx);
>>>>> if (ret < 0)
>>>>> av_log(NULL, AV_LOG_ERROR, "Writing output failed:
>>>>> %s\n",
>>>>> av_err2str(ret));
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ret = FFMIN(ret, input_ret);
>>>> maybe we should give priority to input_ret in case they are both
>>>> negative?
>>>>
>>>> return input_ret < 0 ? input_ret : ret;
>>>
>>> Scripts usually depend on exit code being 0 or something else. Also,
>>> error is logged for both input failure and writer_close failure, so
>>> it doesn't matter.
>>> Finally, input_ret is not initialized if writer_open fails, so we
>>> shouldn't be referencing it outside.
>>
>> I would do something like
>>
>> ret2 = writer_close();
>> ret = FFMIN(ret2, ret);
>>
>> But fine either way, please push any version you prefer, this has
>> been broken for too long. Sorry about that.
>
> The only diff is which return does the new variable store. I like my
> var name better :/
>
> Will push in a couple of hours, 5.1 as well
>
> Regards,
> Gyan
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list