[FFmpeg-devel] Request For Comment no Matroska specs

[Martijn van Beurden]

As a gentle reminder, the Matroska specification can be commented on
until the 22th of this month, so for another 7 days, before it is
finalized and submitted to the IETF to start their review process. See
the message below for details

> Op vr 1 apr. 2022 14:53 schreef Steve Lhomme <robux4 at ycbcr.xyz>:
>>
>> On 2022-04-01 14:33, Steve Lhomme wrote:
>> > Hi ffmmpeg developers,
>> >
>> > As you may know, we are working hard on the Matroska specifications at
>> > the IETF. We already got EBML as an RFC [1]. We are in the process of
>> > finalizing the main Matroska document. Before we submit the document for
>> > formal review before "final" publishing, we would like people who know a
>> > bit about Matroska to review the current draft in case there are parts
>> > missing, hard to decipher or, even worse, bugs.
>> >
>> > This is a 200 pages document, so it may take a while. You can find draft
>> > 09 at [2]. It should explain what is found in Matroska 1 to 4. Some
>> > unused elements have been deprecated since the original informal
>> > specifications. These elements can be found in Annex A.
>>
>> I forgot to mention you can reply here or on the GitHub repository of
>> the specs [3] by creating an issue or even a Pull Request.
>>
>> [3] https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/matroska-specification
>>
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8794/
>> > [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska/

Op za 2 apr. 2022 om 11:27 schreef Martijn van Beurden <mvanb1 at gmail.com>:
>
>
> There is also a HTML version of the draft available, which is perhaps easier to read:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cellar-matroska-09.html
>