[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Why does this break FATE?

[James Almer]

On 9/8/2021 10:14 PM, Soft Works wrote:
> Test seek-lavf-asf failed. Look at tests/data/fate/seek-lavf-asf.err for details.
> make: *** [/build/ffmpeg-git/tests/Makefile:256: fate-seek-lavf-asf] Error 139
> 
> $ cat tests/data/fate/seek-lavf-asf.err
> /build/ffmpeg-git/tests/fate-run.sh: line 78: 21786 Segmentation fault      $target_exec $target_path/"$@"
> 
> 
> It's the same on both Windows/MSYS2 and Linux. Let's see how patchwork results will be...

Please, don't send patches just to have patchwork run FATE for you. It 
litters the mailing list. Do it locally.

> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: softworkz <softworkz at hotmail.com>
> ---
>   libavcodec/version.h | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libavcodec/version.h b/libavcodec/version.h
> index 83db2b242a..d162607f4b 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/version.h
> +++ b/libavcodec/version.h
> @@ -27,9 +27,9 @@
>   
>   #include "libavutil/version.h"
>   
> -#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MAJOR  59
> -#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MINOR   7
> -#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MICRO 102
> +#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MAJOR  60

Bumping major version of any library without the required considerations 
will more likely than not break many tests and scenarios.
If you just want to bump version for a new addition or change, bump 
minor and/or micro.

> +#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MINOR   0
> +#define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MICRO 100
>   
>   #define LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_INT  AV_VERSION_INT(LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MAJOR, \
>                                                  LIBAVCODEC_VERSION_MINOR, \
>