[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] mxfdec.c: fixed frame wrapping detection for MXFGCP1FrameWrappedPicture essence container

Pierre-Anthony Lemieux pal at sandflow.com
Sun Jul 18 21:09:25 EEST 2021


Ok. Thanks. Submitted V2 of the patch at:

http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2021-July/282414.html

On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 12:07 AM Marton Balint <cus at passwd.hu> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 17 Jul 2021, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote:
>
> > You mean something like this?
>
> Yes, thanks.
>
> Marton
>
> >
> > diff --git a/libavformat/mxf.h b/libavformat/mxf.h
> > index ca510f5a2f..b9fe7fe7ef 100644
> > --- a/libavformat/mxf.h
> > +++ b/libavformat/mxf.h
> > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ typedef enum {
> >     D10D11Wrap,
> >     RawAWrap,
> >     RawVWrap,
> > -    AlwaysFrameWrap
> > +    J2KWrap
> > } MXFWrappingIndicatorType;
> >
> > typedef struct MXFLocalTagPair {
> > diff --git a/libavformat/mxfdec.c b/libavformat/mxfdec.c
> > index 7024d2ea7d..7c33150675 100644
> > --- a/libavformat/mxfdec.c
> > +++ b/libavformat/mxfdec.c
> > @@ -1413,8 +1413,7 @@ static void *mxf_resolve_strong_ref(MXFContext
> > *mxf, UID *strong_ref, enum MXFMe
> >
> > static const MXFCodecUL mxf_picture_essence_container_uls[] = {
> >     // video essence container uls
> > -    { { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x07,0x0d,0x01,0x03,0x01,0x02,0x0c,0x06,0x00
> > }, 15,   AV_CODEC_ID_JPEG2000, NULL, 16, AlwaysFrameWrap }, /*  MXF-GC
> > P1 Frame-Wrapped JPEG 2000 */
> > -    { { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x07,0x0d,0x01,0x03,0x01,0x02,0x0c,0x01,0x00
> > }, 14,   AV_CODEC_ID_JPEG2000, NULL, 14 },
> > +    { { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x07,0x0d,0x01,0x03,0x01,0x02,0x0c,0x01,0x00
> > }, 14,   AV_CODEC_ID_JPEG2000, NULL, 14, J2KWrap },
> >     { { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x0d,0x01,0x03,0x01,0x02,0x10,0x60,0x01
> > }, 14,       AV_CODEC_ID_H264, NULL, 15 }, /* H.264 */
> >     { { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x0d,0x01,0x03,0x01,0x02,0x11,0x01,0x00
> > }, 14,      AV_CODEC_ID_DNXHD, NULL, 14 }, /* VC-3 */
> >     { { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x0d,0x01,0x03,0x01,0x02,0x12,0x01,0x00
> > }, 14,        AV_CODEC_ID_VC1, NULL, 14 }, /* VC-1 */
> > @@ -1498,8 +1497,9 @@ static MXFWrappingScheme
> > mxf_get_wrapping_kind(UID *essence_container_ul)
> >             if (val == 0x02)
> >                 val = 0x01;
> >             break;
> > -        case AlwaysFrameWrap:
> > -            val = 0x01;
> > +        case J2KWrap:
> > +            if (val != 0x02)
> > +                val = 0x01;
> >             break;
> >     }
> >     if (val == 0x01)
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 11:19 AM Marton Balint <cus at passwd.hu> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> >>
> >> > sön 2021-07-11 klockan 09:47 -0700 skrev pal at sandflow.com:
> >> >> From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal at sandflow.com>
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal at sandflow.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>
> >> >> Notes:
> >> >>     For JPEG 2000 essence, the MXF input format module currently uses the value of byte 14 of the essence container UL to determines whether the J2K essence is clip- (byte 14 is 0x02)
> >> >>     or frame-wrapped (byte 14 is 0x01). This approach does work when the essence container UL is equal to MXFGCP1FrameWrappedPicture, in which case the essence is always frame-wrapped.
> >>
> >> "This approach does "*not*" work when..."
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>  libavformat/mxf.h    | 3 ++-
> >> >>  libavformat/mxfdec.c | 4 ++++
> >> >>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/libavformat/mxf.h b/libavformat/mxf.h
> >> >> index b1b1fedac7..ca510f5a2f 100644
> >> >> --- a/libavformat/mxf.h
> >> >> +++ b/libavformat/mxf.h
> >> >> @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ typedef enum {
> >> >>      NormalWrap = 0,
> >> >>      D10D11Wrap,
> >> >>      RawAWrap,
> >> >> -    RawVWrap
> >> >> +    RawVWrap,
> >> >> +    AlwaysFrameWrap
> >> >>  } MXFWrappingIndicatorType;
> >> >>
> >> >>  typedef struct MXFLocalTagPair {
> >> >> diff --git a/libavformat/mxfdec.c b/libavformat/mxfdec.c
> >> >> index 3bf480a3a6..7024d2ea7d 100644
> >> >> --- a/libavformat/mxfdec.c
> >> >> +++ b/libavformat/mxfdec.c
> >> >> @@ -1413,6 +1413,7 @@ static void *mxf_resolve_strong_ref(MXFContext *mxf, UID *strong_ref, enum MXFMe
> >> >>
> >> >>  static const MXFCodecUL mxf_picture_essence_container_uls[] = {
> >> >>      // video essence container uls
> >> >> +    { { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x07,0x0d,0x01,0x03,0x01,0x02,0x0c,0x06,0x00 }, 15,   AV_CODEC_ID_JPEG2000, NULL, 16, AlwaysFrameWrap }, /*  MXF-GC P1 Frame-Wrapped JPEG 2000 */
> >>
> >> Setting wrapping_indicator_pos to 16 seems problematic, it might cause
> >> overreads in mxf_get_wrapping_kind, and a bit misleading...
> >>
> >> I'd rather not add a new entry with the same codec id for the same
> >> prefix, but add a JPEG2000Wrap MXFWrappingIndicatorType instead, and
> >> similarly how D10D11Wrap is handled, add a new case and a simple if in
> >> mxf_get_wrapping_kind:
> >>
> >> case JPEG2000Wrap:
> >>     if (val == 0x06)
> >>         val = 0x01;
> >>      break;
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Marton
> >>
> >>
> >> >>      { { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x07,0x0d,0x01,0x03,0x01,0x02,0x0c,0x01,0x00 }, 14,   AV_CODEC_ID_JPEG2000, NULL, 14 },
> >> >>      { { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x0d,0x01,0x03,0x01,0x02,0x10,0x60,0x01 }, 14,       AV_CODEC_ID_H264, NULL, 15 }, /* H.264 */
> >> >>      { { 0x06,0x0e,0x2b,0x34,0x04,0x01,0x01,0x02,0x0d,0x01,0x03,0x01,0x02,0x11,0x01,0x00 }, 14,      AV_CODEC_ID_DNXHD, NULL, 14 }, /* VC-3 */
> >> >> @@ -1497,6 +1498,9 @@ static MXFWrappingScheme mxf_get_wrapping_kind(UID *essence_container_ul)
> >> >>              if (val == 0x02)
> >> >>                  val = 0x01;
> >> >>              break;
> >> >> +        case AlwaysFrameWrap:
> >> >> +            val = 0x01;
> >> >> +            break;
> >> >
> >> > Looks OK. Still passes FATE.
> >> >
> >> > /Tomas
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> >> > ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> >> > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> >> >
> >> > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> >> > ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> >> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> >> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> >> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
> > _______________________________________________
> > ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> > ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
> >
> > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> > ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list